Granted In 19 Hours

Patent examiners have an extremely hard job.  They’re given a patent application—which could be anywhere from a page long up to hundreds of pages, with patent claims ranging from a…

Read more →

Latest Blog Post

Congress Weighs In On Qualcomm and Apple At The ITC

The big Qualcomm news this week was the start of the FTC v. Qualcomm antitrust trial in front of Judge Koh.1  

But Qualcomm’s first ITC case against Apple has also had significant developments—even though the ITC is shut down and the case is on hold.

In particular, a number of members of Congress have addressed comments to the ITC.  These Senators and Representatives express their concern with Qualcomm’s request to exclude their competitor’s products and the serious impacts it would have on U.S. competitive conditions and on national security.  I understand that other Congressional letters are expected once the ITC re-opens submissions. As the ITC’s filing system isn’t necessarily user-friendly, I have collected the current Congressional submissions in this post (and will update with additional submissions as I obtain them).


Letter from Representative Andy Biggs (R-AZ): “An exclusion order would create a monopoly in the open market for baseband chipsets just as 5G deployment begins, which would result in higher prices, less stable supply, and reduced innovation.  The order also would risk the loss of the significant manufacturing jobs that Intel is creating in Arizona.”

Letter from former House Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA): “Forcing Intel out of the market now would deal a serious below to competition in this critical sector [5G] and thus to our economic interests. … The vacuum created by Intel’s absence would invite greater American dependence on foreign suppliers that have no stake in promoting our interests.”

Letter from Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Reps. Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), Kurt Schrader (D-OR), and Peter DeFazio (D-OR): “As the ALJ explained, an exclusion order that creates a monopoly market and eliminates competition in the premium chipset market will dampen the ‘quality, innovation, competitive pricing, and in this case the preservation of a strong U.S. presence in the development of 5G and thus the national security of the United States.  … A healthy and competitive global market driven by American companies will enable our companies to compete on security and privacy, in addition to other market drivers such as performance and cost, leading to a more secure communications infrastructure.”

 

  1.  For a blow-by-blow of this case from a number of reporters in attendance, check out the hashtag #ftcqcom on Twitter.

Recent posts

Comparable Licenses Often Aren’t

One of the more complicated issues in patent law is the issue of damages—the determination of how much money a patent owner receives when they prove infringement and validity.  A patent owner, under 35 U.S.C. § 284, will be awarded “damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable…

Patent Links and Articles To Read By The Fire

While it might not be as cold this New Year’s as it was last year, that doesn’t mean you can’t settle in to read by the fire.  And what better to read about than patents? Here’s what I’ll be taking a look at over New Year’s. Time and the Patent Office First, Professors Michael Frakes…

Don’t Buy Into Qualcomm’s Attempts To Distract From Its Anti-Competitive Behavior

There’s been a lot of discussion about Qualcomm’s recent Chinese injunction against Apple.  But that’s a distraction—the real story is, and remains, the trio of lawsuits against Qualcomm for anti-competitive practices that will be conducted over the first half of 2019.  First, in January, the Federal Trade Commission’s lawsuit. Next, in April, Apple’s lawsuit. And…

ITC Review of Qualcomm-Apple Decision Is Normal Practice

Last week, the International Trade Commission (ITC) decided to review the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in the Qualcomm v. Apple case at the ITC.  Unfortunately, news reports have characterized this as Qualcomm persuading the ITC to review the initial decision, as if it were unusual. It isn’t unusual at all.  The Commission…