dddd
PublishedMay 26, 2023

USPTO’s ANPRM Has Major Problems

Throughout my 26 years in Congress, including three terms as Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, there was a clear need to strengthen our patent system in order to protect the rights of innovators and entrepreneurs. The 2011 passage of the America Invents Act was the high water mark, a bipartisan legislative achievement that gave companies targeted with abusive patent litigation the opportunity to fight back without spending huge sums of money defending themselves in court.  

That’s why I was shocked to see the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issue an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) last month that would not only undermine the progress that we’ve made, but also violate the America Invents Act itself with a series of incompatible proposals ostensibly suggested to the agency by various unidentified “stakeholders.” These proposed rules would negatively impact almost every sector of our economy. The USPTO needs to abandon this ill-conceived effort.

During a hearing before the Judiciary Committee last month, USPTO Director Kathi Vidal was asked by my former colleague, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (CA-18), “Why would you propose something that’s inconsistent with the [America Invents] Act?” 

While these proposed rules have many flaws, what’s most concerning is that they directly violate the statute. For example, under the AIA, parties are given up to a year to file a petition to PTAB. However, under the ANPRM the USPTO proposes to unilaterally rewrite the statute and shorten that deadline to just six months. Similarly, the USPTO proposes to rewrite the statute and impose its own rules about who may or may not file a petition, despite the statute itself being clear that any member of the public may do so. The USPTO also proposes rewriting the standard of review set forth in the statute, changing the AIA’s standard for a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) review from a “reasonable likelihood” threshold to a “compelling merits” test. This would impose a higher threshold for review that not only exceeds the agency’s authority, but unlawfully limits access to reviews for businesses that find themselves under attack from patent trolls. 

The USPTO does not have the power to revise laws that Congress has already written. Every grade schooler in America is taught that Congress writes the laws, and the executive branch enforces the laws. 

A rule that purports to violate the law is, on its face, unconstitutional. Period. Full stop.

In terms of real-world impact, this proposal could seriously weaken our economy. The PTAB review process contributed nearly $3 billion to GDP from 2014 to 2019, with a particular benefit to the manufacturing sector. Limiting access to this critical lifeline for companies that are under attack would be an unforced error at a time when we should be doing everything we can to promote economic growth.

The USPTO got this one wrong. Director Vidal should immediately withdraw the proposed rules that would violate the AIA, weaken access to PTAB reviews, and harm industries that are critical to America’s economic and national security.

Representative Bob Goodlatte

Bob Goodlatte is an American politician, attorney, and lobbyist who served in the United States House of Representatives representing Virginia’s 6th congressional district for 13 terms, including as Chair of the House Judiciary Committee.  Representative Goodlatte was involved with a significant amount of patent reform legislation during his time in office, including being a leading force in passage of the America Invents Act.

More Posts

Reintroduction of Advancing America’s Interests Act is a Welcome Development for Innovators

Last week, Representative David Schweikert (AZ-01) and Don Beyer (VA-08) introduced the Advancing America’s Interests Act (AAIA). If passed, this legislation would help prevent the U.S. Internationa...

USPTO Invalidates VLSI Patent—So Why Didn’t They Review It The First Time?

Earlier today, the USPTO issued its final written decision in IPR2021-01064.  The final written decision found that all challenged claims in VLSI's patent were in fact invalid. So what makes t...

New Report Reaffirms Danger Patent Trolls Pose to Manufacturers, Small Businesses

People whose business models are threatened by strong post-grant review and improved patent quality continue to assert that non-practicing entities (NPEs) and the patent troll narrative is a myth or a...

Subscribe to Patent Progress

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.