PublishedApril 29, 2021

An IDEA Whose Time Has Come

Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee will mark up the IDEA Act.  IDEA, sponsored by Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI), stands for “Inventor Diversity for Economic Advancement.”  One of the problems with researching diversity and patents, much less diversity and innovation, is that there isn’t good data on who invents—there are all kinds of proxy metrics that people use, especially correlation of naming patterns to gender or race, but those proxies are necessarily imperfect.  For example, while names like Lauren or Ashley are typically given to women, there are any number of men with those names as well, and the proportion often changes over time.  And a few names, like Jessie, Marion, and Jackie, are given almost equally between genders, meaning there is no proxy value to those names at all.   

IDEA helps fix this problem.  IDEA requires the Patent Office to create a procedure which allows patent applicants to, on a purely voluntary basis, submit demographic information to the Office alongside their patent application.  That information would not be part of the patent application file, would not be available to examiners during examination, and would not ever be made public.  However, the Office would be required to issue an annual report that provides an aggregated demographic breakdown of inventors in general and broken down by technology, country of residence, and state of residence.  That information could provide significant new knowledge for researchers and policymakers seeking to increase innovation diversity, a crucial challenge in the years to come.

IDEA isn’t perfect.  Voluntary collection introduces its own challenges to research, challenges like self-selection biases.  But any information would be better than the status quo.  Hopefully IDEA will sail through markup without any hostile amendments, heading towards a floor vote in the near future.

Josh Landau

Patent Counsel, CCIA

Joshua Landau is the Patent Counsel at the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), where he represents and advises the association regarding patent issues.  Mr. Landau joined CCIA from WilmerHale in 2017, where he represented clients in patent litigation, counseling, and prosecution, including trials in both district courts and before the PTAB.

Prior to his time at WilmerHale, Mr. Landau was a Legal Fellow on Senator Al Franken’s Judiciary staff, focusing on privacy and technology issues.  Mr. Landau received his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and his B.S.E.E. from the University of Michigan.  Before law school, he spent several years as an automotive engineer, during which time he co-invented technology leading to U.S. Patent No. 6,934,140.

Follow @PatentJosh on Twitter.

More Posts

Congress Can Find Common Ground on Transparency

Postmortems from the November 8th elections are in full swing with pundits and operatives making bold claims about what the results mean for Democrats, Republicans, and the country. The dust still has...

Federal Circuit Temporarily Pauses Judge Connolly’s Disclosure Orders In Delaware

In its order on a mandamus request filed by MAVEXAR-linked entity Nimitz Technologies LLC, the Federal Circuit has temporarily paused Judge Connolly's order that entities in his court disclose details...

With frivolous NPE patent suits clogging courts, counsel’s diligence and ethics suffer

U.S. patent litigation is big business. Billion-dollar judgments, readily available litigation financing, and favorable venues and lax filing standards mean between three and four thousand suits are f...

Subscribe to Patent Progress

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.