PublishedJanuary 24, 2018

Standard Essential Patents In The News

Standard essential patents (SEPs) are in the news today in a couple ways.

First, the EU antitrust authorities fined Qualcomm $1.2 billion over conduct that involved locking Apple into an exclusive supplier arrangement in order to harm competing baseband chipset makers.  The EU investigation isn’t the only place Qualcomm’s anti-competitive conduct is being challenged; they’ve also been fined by the Korean FTC and the US FTC is currently pursuing a case against Qualcomm.  Apple has also filed a lawsuit against Qualcomm.  As Patent Progress has previously discussed, Qualcomm’s conduct harms competition and thereby harms consumers.  Qualcomm, rather than changing course, has filed additional lawsuits aimed at using their SEP portfolio to harm companies that challenge their anti-competitive conduct.  

Second, 58 companies, trade associations, and academics, including CCIA, joined in sending a letter to the Department of Justice Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim.  The letter describes the impacts of SEPs on industry and how SEP policy can both help and harm innovation.  As the letter notes, “interoperability standards create enormous value for consumers and fuel follow-on innovation.”  

At the same time, patents on aspects of these interoperability standards create risks of hold-up (where a patent owner waits until their patent is incorporated into the standard and then can extract a greater-than-market value for the patent as it is impossible to obtain any of the benefit of the standard without it.)  And the choice by standard setting organizations to implement any of a variety of patent licensing policies (ranging from FRAND to royalty-free to unrestricted licensing) shouldn’t be considered an antitrust issue, but rather a voluntary commitment by participants in a standard.  Our letter addresses these issues, and others, which we hope to see DOJ continue to consider as they develop policy around standard essential patents.

Josh Landau

Patent Counsel, CCIA

Joshua Landau is the Patent Counsel at the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), where he represents and advises the association regarding patent issues.  Mr. Landau joined CCIA from WilmerHale in 2017, where he represented clients in patent litigation, counseling, and prosecution, including trials in both district courts and before the PTAB.

Prior to his time at WilmerHale, Mr. Landau was a Legal Fellow on Senator Al Franken’s Judiciary staff, focusing on privacy and technology issues.  Mr. Landau received his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and his B.S.E.E. from the University of Michigan.  Before law school, he spent several years as an automotive engineer, during which time he co-invented technology leading to U.S. Patent No. 6,934,140.

Follow @PatentJosh on Twitter.

More Posts

The Ripple Effects of Patent Venue

A recent article described the outsized roles that two modest cities in Texas play in U.S. patent litigation, but there's more to the story of America’s odd patent venue rules. The article alludes t...

Another startup bites the dust, courtesy of patent trolls

A handful of interest groups like to claim that patent trolls are a myth—that they're a straw man used to shape IP policy in ways that are harmful to patent holders. Mycroft AI is one of many startu...

How Challenging Low Quality Patents is Lowering Drug Prices

The FTC made headlines in May when it announced it was challenging over 300 “junk” patents in the FDA’s “Orange Book,” including patents on popular drugs like Ozempic and Victoza. With this ...

Subscribe to Patent Progress

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.