PublishedJune 25, 2015

Why We Need to Fix Venue: E.D. Texas

Sam B. Hall U.S. Couthouse

I (and others) have written about the Eastern District of Texas. It’s a judicial district that handles more patent cases than any other district in the country. In fact, one judge, Judge Rodney Gilstrap, personally handles more than twice as many patent cases as any other judge. Nearly all of his patent cases are filed by patent trolls.

The Eastern District of Texas had over 1,400 patent cases filed last year, and over 1,000 patent cases have been filed there in the first half of 2015. (Source: Lex Machina) Just last month (May), out of the 418 lawsuits filed, 295 were filed in Marshall, Texas, a town with a population of just under 24,000. For comparison, there were only 199 patent lawsuits filed in total in May 2014.

Why do so many patent trolls file in the Eastern District of Texas? It’s simple: judges in the district have rules that make cases extremely expensive for defendants extremely quickly. The judges require discovery to start almost immediately, and they don’t tend to limit costs at all. Plus, the schedules are shortened, so that those costs rack up right away. The pressure is intense for defendants to settle.

The Eastern District’s judges also don’t grant many motions for summary judgment, meaning that it’s either all the way through trial or settle.

The Eastern District of Texas is also notorious for not transferring cases to other venues, even though Marshall, Tyler, and Texarkana have next to nothing to do with any of the cases. You might wonder why overloaded judges would be so reluctant to transfer cases to places with some connection, like, say, the principal place of business of the defendant.

One often-proposed answer is that Marshall makes a ton of money from these cases. Lawyers come to town for depositions, hearings, and trials, and they spend money. Lots of it. For example, 4% (about $800,000 a year) of Marshall’s annual revenues come from hotel and motel occupancy taxes.

If we don’t shut down the business of patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas, we’re going to have a hard time dealing with the patent troll problem.

And that’s why the venue provision of the Innovation Act, which I’ll write about in my next post, is so important.

Matt Levy

Previously, Matt was patent counsel at the Computer & Communications Industry Association

More Posts

CCIA Senior Counsel Joshua Landau Testifies To Congress

In case you missed it, I testified to the House Judiciary Committee's IP Subcommittee last week about whether the output of AIs should receive patent and/or copyright protection. The hearing is avail...

Tackling Patent Trolls In Foxboro

A new lawsuit in Massachusetts proves that even NFL teams are not safe from baseless accusations from patent trolls. While the New England Patriots are usually concerned with defending their home turf...

The Judicial Conference Takes on “Judge Shopping”

On March 12th, the U.S. Judicial Conference announced policy recommendations aimed at putting an end to “judge shopping,” the much-exploited practice by which litigants choose the judges who hear ...

Subscribe to Patent Progress

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.