PublishedFebruary 28, 2013

Judge Rader misses the point

At IPWatchdog Gene Quinn covers a speech by Federal Circuit Chief Judge Rader at the Association of University Technology Managers in San Antonio.  According to the post, the Chief Judge said matter-of-factly

Yes, I do think there is a litigation abuse problem.” Game on! Chief Judge Rader would go on to discuss the blackmail-like shake-downs that are plaguing the industry and giving the patent system an unjustified bad name.

Yet Judge Rader later stated:

There is nothing wrong with the patent system. The patent system has a narrow focus…. It’s not a competition program…. The things that the patent system is criticized for is not its job.

It is hard to read Chief Judge Rader’s comments to say anything other than ‘yes, there is a problem, but it isn’t our problem.’  But we cannot so easily foist responsibility for the patent litigation crisis off onto some faceless ‘other’ bad actor in some other discipline.

Patent assertion entities now comprise more than 60% of patent litigation.  These are IP claims brought by IP lawyers under IP law and often appealed to a specialized IP court.  This is not a generic litigation problem.  We have met the enemy, and he is us.

circle 09

Matt Schruers

More Posts

Litigation Investment Entities Threaten United States Security

In mid-September, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability held a hearing titled Unsuitable Litigation: Oversight of Third-Party Litigation Funding. Then, Senators Joe Manchin (D-WA) and Jo...

Input on the United States Government National Standards Strategy for CET (Part 1)

This post first appeared on SEP Essentials. The Department of Commerce of the United States government in conjunction with the U.S. National Institute of Standard and Technology (“NIST”) has a...

What Europe Is Doing Right On SEPs

The European Union (EU) is diving into one of patent policy’s most controversial questions: how should patents on technologies which are essential for wireless connectivity be licensed? As the range...

Subscribe to Patent Progress

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.