dddd
PublishedDecember 5, 2012

USPTO Should Be Applauded for Notice on Patent Transparency

In a round of good news, the USPTO has published a notice that it will be holding a roundtable on January 11, 2013 to look into regulations to “require greater public transparency concerning the ownership of patent applications and patents.”  The deadline for requesting to participate in the roundtable is December 21, 2012, and the deadline for submitting written comments is January 25, 2013.  In a good article by Nate Raymond at Reuters, he explains the notice and goes over the implications it would have on some of the worst patent trolls.  Specifically, Intellectual Ventures and Acacia Research often use shell holding companies to hold patents, making it highly complicated to figure out who actually owns a patent.

This is a positive development and we hope the USPTO will create this needed transparency.  Transparency in patent ownership will allow companies to have a better understanding of exactly who is suing them, whom they would need a licensing fee from and the motivations of the party sitting across the table.  For companies doing searches to see if they are violating a patent, it will enable them to know whom they have to talk to if they find a troublesome patent.

It would also make it tougher for trolls to use complicated corporate structures to try and hide potential liabilities resulting from their actions.  Additionally, it would help U.S. competition authorities, including the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice, have a better understanding of the impact trolls are having on marketplace competition.  Basically, it would make the business of being a troll slightly tougher, and that is a good thing.

circle 09

Josh Lamel

More Posts

Input on the United States Government National Standards Strategy for CET (Part 1)

This post first appeared on SEP Essentials. The Department of Commerce of the United States government in conjunction with the U.S. National Institute of Standard and Technology (“NIST”) has a...

What Europe Is Doing Right On SEPs

The European Union (EU) is diving into one of patent policy’s most controversial questions: how should patents on technologies which are essential for wireless connectivity be licensed? As the range...

Follow the Founders and Insist on Review of Unjust Monopolies Created by Invalid Patents

This post draws from and summarizes a forthcoming law review article from the author. The full article is available on SSRN. A patent is a monopoly, for a certain time, on the sale of something fo...

Subscribe to Patent Progress

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.