Many thanks to the Consumer Electronics Association, which gave us permission to use its trollAn entity in the business of being infringed — by analogy to the mythological troll that exacted payments from the unwary. Cf. NPE, PAE, PME. See Reitzig and Henkel, Patent Trolls, the Sustainability of ‘Locking-in-to-Extort’ Strategies, and Implications for Innovating Firms. figure.
More Posts
The Judicial Conference Takes on “Judge Shopping”
On March 12th, the U.S. Judicial Conference announced policy recommendations aimed at putting an end to “judge shopping,” the much-exploited practice by which litigants choose the judges who hear ...
Guest Post: Time to Shine Light on Dark Third-Party Litigation Funding
This post, written by Jerry Theodorou, initially appeared in the R Street’s Real Solutions Blog
A pitched battle between proponents and opponents of third-party litigation financing (TPLF) has en...
Another Litigation Funding Dispute
In what has become a recurring topic on Patent Progress, another dispute between a patent troll and a litigation funder has emerged. This time, it is between the Irish NPE, Arigna Technology; its law ...